Further Actions - CAPA
How You Can Handle CAPA Programs Within ION
Overview
The issue ticket is the most direct connection to the manufacturing floor within ION Factory OS. This connection allows ION issue tickets to be automatically populated with details such as associated parts, processes, responsible teams, and supplier-related documentation. With all this information in one place, the responsible engineer can quickly determine the disposition and resolution of the issue.
The workflow continues in ION through a redlining process that captures the corrective actions needed to fix the occurrence. The final step involves relating those corrective actions to further actions. These further actions enable manufacturers to implement comprehensive changes to their processes or effectively communicate to resolve supplier-related issues, even after closing the original ION issue ticket. This is a necessary continuation of any quality process.
First Resonance has started the roll out of this feature. If you are interested in this capability please reach out to the team to get involved and benefit from giving early input.
Use Cases
Supplier Related ION Issues and Supplier Corrective Actions
Use Case #1 in Action:
Groupings of ION Issues to Address Deep Seated Root Cause
Use Case #2 in Action:
Further Actions to Capture Non-ION related Continuous Improvement Opportunities
Use Case #3 in Action:
Further actions are not just limited to the cases above. The overall flexibility these tickets offer lend themselves to good containers for a variety of objectives while still maintaining traceability back to core ION Objects. Link parts, runs, and issues however you like to create a network of connections with Further Actions.
Best Practices
Creating Resolution Actions
Define your actions for the Further Action and track progress against them.
Create one plan with all your actions within it OR create each action in a unique plan to be as granular as you wish.
Define the actions needed in two ways.
Create a blank plan and free form add steps to accomplish the requirements for resolution.
Utilize a known process for resolution when repeat actions are needed. Choose a procedure that is templated to solve the specific occurrence.
When to Use the Canceled State for Further Actions
The Canceled state is useful for managing the relevance and priority of further actions within your organization. Here are the key points to consider:
Accidental Creation: If a further action is created by mistake, it can be moved to the Canceled state to indicate that the action is not needed.
Editing Restrictions: Further actions in the Canceled state cannot be edited. However, they can be moved back to the In Progress state if they were accidentally canceled.
Avoid This Flow: If a further action is approved and then needs to be canceled, it can be moved back to the Approved state as all approval requests have been satisfied. However, this practice is not recommended. See point four for the best practice.
Ideal Workflow for Re-evaluation: If a resolved further action is found to be insufficient, the recommended process is to reopen the further action. This will move the action back to the In Progress state, where necessary changes can be made, and the correct approvals can be requested. This approach avoids confusion and ensures that actions are appropriately tracked and managed.
By following these guidelines, you can maintain a clear and efficient workflow for managing further actions.
Last updated