Further Actions - CAPA

How You Can Handle CAPA Programs Within ION

Overview

The issue ticket is the most direct connection to the manufacturing floor within ION Factory OS. This connection allows ION issue tickets to be automatically populated with details such as associated parts, processes, responsible teams, and supplier-related documentation. With all this information in one place, the responsible engineer can quickly determine the disposition and resolution of the issue.

The workflow continues in ION through a redlining process that captures the corrective actions needed to fix the occurrence. The final step involves relating those corrective actions to further actions. These further actions enable manufacturers to implement comprehensive changes to their processes or effectively communicate to resolve supplier-related issues, even after closing the original ION issue ticket. This is a necessary continuation of any quality process.

First Resonance has started the roll out of this feature. If you are interested in this capability please reach out to the team to get involved and benefit from giving early input.

Use Cases

  1. Supplier Related ION Issues and Supplier Corrective Actions

Use Case #1 in Action:

  1. Groupings of ION Issues to Address Deep Seated Root Cause

Use Case #2 in Action:

  1. Further Actions to Capture Non-ION related Continuous Improvement Opportunities

Use Case #3 in Action:

  1. Further actions are not just limited to the cases above. The overall flexibility these tickets offer lend themselves to good containers for a variety of objectives while still maintaining traceability back to core ION Objects. Link parts, runs, and issues however you like to create a network of connections with Further Actions.

Best Practices

When to Use the Canceled State for Further Actions

The Canceled state is useful for managing the relevance and priority of further actions within your organization. Here are the key points to consider:

  1. Accidental Creation: If a further action is created by mistake, it can be moved to the Canceled state to indicate that the action is not needed.

  2. Editing Restrictions: Further actions in the Canceled state cannot be edited. However, they can be moved back to the In Progress state if they were accidentally canceled.

  3. Avoid This Flow: If a further action is approved and then needs to be canceled, it can be moved back to the Approved state as all approval requests have been satisfied. However, this practice is not recommended. See point four for the best practice.

  4. Ideal Workflow for Re-evaluation: If a resolved further action is found to be insufficient, the recommended process is to reopen the further action. This will move the action back to the In Progress state, where necessary changes can be made, and the correct approvals can be requested. This approach avoids confusion and ensures that actions are appropriately tracked and managed.

By following these guidelines, you can maintain a clear and efficient workflow for managing further actions.

Last updated